“Moore’s Law” suggests that computer processing capabilities double every two years.
That’s been my limited understanding of it, anyway. Wikipedia says: “Moore’s law is the observation that the number of transistors in an integrated circuit (IC) doubles about every two years…. The observation is named after Gordon Moore, the co-founder of Fairchild Semiconductor and Intel (and former CEO of the latter), who in 1965 posited a doubling every year in the number of components per integrated circuit, and projected this rate of growth would continue for at least another decade. In 1975, looking forward to the next decade, he revised the forecast to doubling every two years, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 41%. While Moore did not use empirical evidence in forecasting that the historical trend would continue, his prediction has held since 1975 and has since become known as a ‘law’.”
“Industry experts have not reached a consensus on exactly when Moore’s law will cease to apply. Microprocessor architects report that semiconductor advancement has slowed industry-wide since around 2010, slightly below the pace predicted by Moore’s law. In September 2022, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang considered Moore’s law dead.”
Everything has its limits. You can divide a nation into groups, smaller and smaller, but the absolute minimum would be one person in a group. You can divide an ounce of gold into fractions, but eventually you will be stopped if you can get to a single atom of gold – if you split a single atom it isn’t the same element anymore.
Transistors also have a minimum physical limit – they are made of metal, etched onto a silicon ship. We can reduce the width of the metal circuits on the board, but they are real physical objects and also need space between circuits. A human hair is about 80,000 to 100,000 nanometers wide. In May 2021, IBM announced the creation of the first 2 nm computer chip – forty to 50 thousand times thinner than a human hair. How much smaller can they possibly get? Quantum fluctuations already started to occur when size dipped to 7nm – some of the electrons jump out of the circuits at this point – and the smaller the circuits, the more quantum tunneling occurs, this means less reliable processors, which means that as size decreases and mistakes increase, we might have to double or triple the processors for confirmation, to eliminate bad answers based on stray electrons.
Physical materials also have limits on how small they can be before they are too thin to reliably function. Atomic spacing in Silicon is 0.21nm. Copper’s atomic spacing is 0.25nm. In other words, the dielectric for a circuit’s gate at 1 nanometer is only a few atoms thick. It is believed that the technology will soon allow 1 nanometer transistor circuits – but that beyond that the components cannot function, and this trend of reduction in size and improvement in capabilities will come to a screeching halt. (Some would suggest that secret programs have had 1nm circuits for decades, and that what they release to the public follows a well-thought-out schedule.)
Rumors abound that TPTB want the fastest possible computers in place before rolling out the rest of Agenda 2030. On the surface each aspect of the agenda sounds wonderful, doesn’t it?
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is a plan of action for countries, the UN system, and other actors. It was launched by the UN in New York in 2015. The agenda’s goals include:
- Ending poverty and hunger
- Realizing human rights for all
- Achieving gender equality
- Protecting the planet and its natural resources
- Reducing inequality
The agenda is based on international human rights standards. It includes economic, social, civil, political, and cultural rights. The agenda also aims for a world with:
- Universal respect for human dignity
- The rule of law
- Justice
- Equality
- Non-discrimination
“In these Goals and targets, we are setting out a supremely ambitious and transformational vision…. The scale and ambition of the new Agenda requires a revitalized Global Partnership to ensure its implementation.” Dave’s translation: they want to change everything, tearing down the cultural foundations of society and they’ll need a powerful world government (“revitalized Global Partnership”) to enforce the unwanted changes. The changes will centralize power more completely in the hands of the few, and will not be welcomed by the masses…. Unless….
A crisis is artificially created that has the common man shitting his pants in fear, and the elite then comes to save the day offering the radical changes that can fix the problems they designed and allegedly prevent them from ever happening again. Some combination of financial collapse, plague, starvation, and war would probably do the trick. When we’re all scared and desperate enough we’ll be thankful that they were able to put an end to the problems, no matter how many freedoms we give up for them to do it.
The next big contrived crisis is just a few months away in mid 2024.
Consider the possibility that one nanometer semiconductors are a sign that we only have a few years left before they aim to really strike fear in our hearts. Once the fastest possible semiconductor chips are possible, it will take a few years for most infrastructure to incorporate them. After that they will allegedly feel the time is right to turn the screws on us, and let their planned and engineered hell break loose [I’m thinking at least a 9-digit death toll – over 100 million fatalities – not that many years away] all to wear us down and make us desperate enough to accept the tech-tatorship they want to impose on us.
About Author
