I was Wrong About Noah’s Flood – I Thought it Wasn’t a Pole Shift

I know, I must seem like Mr. Pole Shift to some readers, as I wrote a book on the subject and I mention pole shift evidence a lot. If you hadn’t read my book it would be a reasonable assumption that I attributed a pole shift as the cause of “Noah’s” Flood. But I have long assumed that Noah’s Flood was not caused by a pole shift – but from the asteroid impact that hit the southern Indian Ocean over 5,000 years ago and formed Burckle Crater – 22 miles wide on the seafloor two miles underwater. Can you imagine the force of the impact that plowed through two miles of ocean and still left a crater over 20 miles across? The tsunamis in Madagascar were 660 feet high! I have no geological evidence of the height water reached as it was funneled up the Persian Gulf, but I have no doubt it wiped out whatever civilizations existed in cities on the coasts of India and the Middle East. Isaac Asimov commented on this decades ago… and I assumed that was a solid case closed on the cause of Noah’s Flood.

But recently there is new evidence that even though the bigger and more destructive pole shifts come roughly every 12,000 years, there WAS a “minor” pole shift 6,000 years ago.

About Author

David Montaigne

See author's posts