February 24, 2024

Trump’s lawsuits to fight a false Democrat victory achieved through massive vote fraud will overturn the MSM announcement that Biden won.

We are all aware of mounting evidence of crimes committed in swing states. Trump votes were trashed, machine counting software was programmed to switch votes in huge blocks from Trump to Biden, late night ballot dumps sometimes added over 100,000 votes for Biden, with zero for Trump – and even added nothing for the other Democrats up for election! Many states had more votes than registered voters…. Yet the MSM tells us Biden clearly won, while every statement of doubt from the right has a disclaimer added.

Just today I read that in Pennsylvania: “Over 51,000 ballots were marked as returned just a day after they were sent out—an extraordinary speed, given U.S. Postal Service (USPS) delivery times, while nearly 35,000 were returned on the same day they were mailed out. Another more than 23,000 have a return date earlier than the sent date. More than 9,000 have no sent date.” Pennsylvania had Trump ahead by 690,000 votes on election night – then the overnight shenanigans “found” lots of votes that – just like in Michigan and Wisconsin and other swing states – were allegedly almost 100% for Biden – a far higher percentage than any legitimately blue area like California or Washington D.C. would even have. Very believable, right?

But what it all boils down to is really: how does the Constitution tell us this will be handled? Because the mainstream media (the propaganda wing of the Democratic Party) does not get to make the decision. And the states will give the election back to Trump when the evidence proves Biden only “won” through massive, systemic fraud.

Democrat Van Jones doesn’t like this reality, but he says the same thing starting at the 9 minute mark in this video:


Now that I’ve made the main point of my article, and you see how disputed election results will lead to a second term for Trump, I doubt many readers will continue into the realm of my additional speculations…. But with the violent nature of ANTIFA and the many riots we have seen bring cities to their knees over far less important matters, can you truly say massive civil unrest won’t follow this decision on the presidency? What is more likely, peaceful acceptance of the decision – or widespread violence and martial law?

For many years, I’ve been writing books about end-of-the-world type events from the evidence for an upcoming pole shift catastrophe to Nostradamus prophecies of WWIII. And one thing that bothers me about that last one is that although Nostradamus clearly describes Islamic armies in Europe for a world war ending by 2028 – he also mentions America, and lets us know America will not be involved in the war for the first few years.

What on Earth would keep America out, and why would Americans allow European allies to be overrun? I used to think America would have to be overwhelmed in a simultaneous war with China, or that the United States would be taken out early with a nuclear first strike or an EMP that destroys the electrical grid and most other technology. But now I’m wondering – do we do it to ourselves? Is civil unrest and martial law, or even civil war, the problem that leaves the US unable to defend Europe as Nostradamus describes the early stages of WWIII?

What do you think?

About Author