

There was a video below promoting the idea that an “Ice Age” returns “like clockwork” – but unfortunately it has been removed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMRWIhkDdy0&w=854&h=480
It had suggested that a pole shift and new ice age comes every 11,500 years with a more intense one every two cycles (23,000 years.) I would suggest that his timing is slightly off, and he may be ignoring 1400-1500 years of melting glaciers in between – for a total of 12,900-13,000 years per half cycle event, and an almost 26,000 year cycle between the most intense events – just like the 25,920 year cycle of precession of the earth’s axis – which seems to be linked to cosmic events….
A pole shift creates new “ice ages” at the new poles, much like there are “ice ages” in Antarctica and Greenland today. The evidence for a regular cycle of POLE SHIFTS that explain regional “ice ages” is massive, and I cover all the details in my newest book:
POLE SHIFT: Evidence Will Not Be Silenced
The first video link directly below no longer seems active:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMRWIhkDdy0&w=854&h=480]
This one wasn’t the one I originally wanted to post, but it’s still relevant:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7I8Aksi9ys&w=1215&h=480]
Randall Carlson is always good:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-W6Lftgq8mg&w=1215&h=480]
Is this one of them?
“The Coming Ice Age Cannot be AVOIDED”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFyIA2TYXNc
This video does seem generally supportive of our expectations.
What most alternative climatologists fail to notice is that there is an extremely sudden change to The Earth. Even if there is a gradual onset of climatic and other anomalies that ramps up over a period of years prior, this is not the ‘main event’.
One doesn’t have to spend 12,000 years in preparation for something that mankind could otherwise accommodate as and when it happens. Nor does one have to build megalithic pyramids that will last umpteen platonic years just so that future civilisations can be tipped off as to the ELE that will strike without warning.
So this is not a mere argument as to whether climate change is anthropogenic or cosmogenic. It is to recognise that anthropogenic climate change was invented by the cognoscenti precisely to avoid alarm over precursors to pole shift…
Agreed – climate change is both slow and gradual and is a DISTRACTION from evidence point to a sudden pole shift cataclysm coming due soon. https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/global-warming-pole-shifts/