May 7, 2024

Maverickstar says pole shift is imminent and governments are fully aware.

I commented: “The Bible is full of astronomical references that clue us in to timing the next pole shift. Many prophetic descriptions of the sky manifest in December 2019, as the sun moon and planets also move in ways that act out all major steps of an ancient Jewish wedding ceremony during Hanukkah. If you understand the significance, read:

End Times and 2019

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h35F_j31qwc&w=854&h=641]

Pole Shifts in the Bible

Pole Shift: Evidence Will Not Be Silenced

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1R9KXMrdXHU&w=854&h=480]

As I mentioned in an earlier post, another blog made a great point about:

2 Peter 3:5-7: “…it escapes their notice that by the word of God the heavens existed long ago and the earth was formed out of water and by water, through which the world at that time was destroyed, being flooded with water.  But by His word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, kept for the day of judgment and destruction…”

2 Peter 3:5-7 is NOT a reference to Noah’s flood. There are only two (2) places in the entire Bible where the Earth is flooded by water. One is at the time of Noah’s flood (Genesis 7). The other is at Genesis 1:2 where it speaks about the condition of the Earth at the time just before God said, “Let there be light.” Now, if 2 Peter 3:5-7 is not a cross-reference to Noah’s flood, then it MUST be a cross-reference to Genesis 1:2 (there is no other alternative – simple logic). And if 2 Peter 3:5-7 is a cross-reference to Genesis 1:2, then the Holy Spirit is calling your attention to something very significant that millions of Neo-Creationists are blindly overlooking. Specifically, that a glorious ancient world that God created in the distant past (Genesis 1:1), had long since been utterly destroyed; plunged into deep darkness and overflowed by a raging flood of great waters on a universal scale at the time of Genesis 1:2.”

“…It is very important that we show you the Biblical clues that tell us why 2 Peter 3:5-7 is not a reference to Noah’s flood.  Clue #1 – Compare the phrase: “the heavens and earth, which are now” to the phrase the “heavens were of old“: What does this mean? Ask yourself this question: When Noah’s flood happened did it change anything in the upper heavens? Would a flood on the Earth’s surface have any effect on the sun, moon, or stars high above? The obvious answer is NO….”

(A pole shift, in which the surface of the entire planet moves as one solid piece over the core, would drastically change our view of the heavens.)

Isaiah 13:13I will make the heavens tremble, and the earth will be shaken from its place.”
Isaiah 24:1 “Behold, the Lord lays the earth waste, devastates it, distorts its surface and scatters its inhabitants.”
Job 9:5-6 “It is God who removes the mountains, they know not how, When He overturns them in His anger; Who shakes the earth out of its place, And its pillars tremble.”
Psalms 46:2 “though the earth should change and though the mountains slip into the heart of the sea.”

Haggai 2:6 “For thus says the LORD of hosts, ‘Once more in a little while, I am going to shake the heavens and the earth, the sea also and the dry land.”

Revelation 6:14The sky was split apart like a scroll when it is rolled up, and every mountain and island were moved out of their places.
Revelation 16:18-19 “There was a great earthquake, such as there had not been since man came to be upon the earth, so great an earthquake was it, and so mighty.  The great city was split into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell.”
Revelation 21:1 “Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the first heaven and the first earth passed away…”
and then right back to starting over again:
Genesis 1:1 traditionally begins in English: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was formless and void…”
But renowned linguist and expert on Genesis Arthur Custance said we should not read it this way; that the grammar is wrong if we assume this interpretation. Without a lengthy explanation (I’ll do another post on this later) I’ll jump to his conclusion after decades of research:  “There is, on the basis of the evidence, far more reason to translate Genesis 1:2 as “IN A FORMER STATE GOD PERFECTED THE HEAVENS AND EARTH; BUT THE EARTH HAD BECOME A DEVASTATED RUIN… than there is for any of the conventional translations.”  Custance’s scholarly conclusions are just one more piece of the puzzle supporting the idea that both Genesis and Revelation describe a POLE SHIFT.

Pole Shift Front Page Book Cover

About Author