Rumors over the last several months suggested that the U.S. Government was due to release a new report in late June that would acknowledge a new level of admissions about UFOs – and offer a new level of official disclosure about aliens as the source of these UAPs/UFOs.
Unfortunately for anyone who hoped that the trend of over 70 years of official denial was about to end – the report has come out and most of the sightings are attributed to mundane causes: “These observations could be the result of sensor errors, spoofing, or observer misperception.” Later in the official report they say there are 5 categories of sightings: “Our analysis of the data supports the construct that if and when individual UAP incidents are resolved they will fall into one of five potential explanatory categories: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, USG or U.S. industry developmental programs, foreign adversary systems, and a catchall ‘other’ bin.” At least there is an unexplained/other bin….
“UAP would also represent a national security challenge if they are foreign adversary collection platforms or provide evidence a potential adversary has developed either a breakthrough or disruptive technology.” But Foo Fighters were observers in many theaters of WWII in the early to mid 1940s. Roswell and other alleged UFO crashes and shootdown events began no later than 1947. So unless foreign adversaries developed anti-gravity propulsion or other UFO-like technology during WWII – we can’t explain this away with recent technological developments.
The Defense Department suggests a variety of reasons for inconclusive reports. First, the sensors used by military aircraft, ships, etc. are specifically tailored for limited tasks and not very useful for detecting, tracking, and recording craft that don’t fall within expected parameters. Second, they allegedly just started paying attention recently: “Limited data and inconsistency in reporting are key challenges to evaluating UAP. No standardized reporting mechanism existed until the Navy established one in March 2019. The Air Force subsequently adopted that mechanism in November 2020.” Third, reporting such sightings has been discouraged for generations: “Narratives from aviators in the operational community and analysts from the military and IC describe disparagement associated with observing UAP, reporting it, or attempting to discuss it with colleagues. Although the effects of these stigmas have lessened as senior members of the scientific, policy, military, and intelligence communities engage on the topic seriously in public, reputational risk may keep many observers silent, complicating scientific pursuit of the topic.”
“UAP sightings also tended to cluster around U.S. training and testing grounds….” This could be because the craft are ours, because aliens are interested in our weapons capabilities, or the government answer: “but we assess that this may result from a collection bias as a result of focused attention, greater numbers of latest-generation sensors operating in those areas.”
The farthest they go is to say that out of thousands of reported sightings “And a Handful of UAP Appear to Demonstrate Advanced Technology In 18 incidents, described in 21 reports, observers reported unusual UAP movement patterns or flight characteristics. Some UAP appeared to remain stationary in winds aloft, move against the wind, maneuver abruptly, or move at considerable speed, without discernable means of propulsion. In a small number of cases, military aircraft systems processed radio frequency (RF) energy associated with UAP sightings. The UAPTF holds a small amount of data that appear to show UAP demonstrating acceleration or a degree of signature management.” In other words, a tiny portion of sightings remain officially interesting and unexplained.
They need more money, concluding: “Increase Investment in Research and Development – The UAPTF has indicated that additional funding for research and development could further the future study of the topics laid out in this report.” Big surprise.
I would be negligent in my duties if I did not mention Bob Lazar, the Area 51 whistleblower who came forward in the 1980s claiming that he worked on back-engineering one such flying craft that wasn’t ours…. He said he was aware of at least nine craft in U.S. Government possession and that many, if not all of them, were recovered from “archeological digs.” This suggests they are ancient human technology – from an earlier, technologically advanced civilization that was largely destroyed and forgotten. POLE SHIFTS explain how Atlantis or a similar civilization could end, and leave little but legends and myths (and hundreds of pages of technical details on multiple types of flying craft in ancient Sanskrit manuscripts about vimana….
.
.
.
About Author
